Google accused of deception in selling AdSense keyword ads
NEW YORK - An advertiser sued Google Inc. in federal court Tuesday claiming the company deceived him and charged for ads displayed on third-party Web sites, even though he left blank an "optional" box that seemed to address the issue.
The dispute is over Google's popular AdSense program, which targets ads to keywords in articles and other content at participating sites. The program complements the traditional AdWords program, which runs targeted ads alongside Google's search results. Ads under both programs generate the bulk of Google's revenues.
The lawsuit accuses Google of defrauding advertisers out of millions of dollars collectively by "redefining the universally understood meaning of an input form left blank."
The plaintiff in the case, David Almeida, had signed up for Google ads to promote his private investigation business in Massachusetts. Because he did not want to buy AdSense ads, Almeida said he left the maximum per-click bid blank, believing "optional" meant he could opt out of the AdSense program by doing so.
Instead, it turned out the AdWords bid applied when he did not exercise that option, and he should have put "zero" into the box to opt out, said his attorney, Brian Kabateck.
"Most of the customers that actually fall victim to this scam are the unsophisticated advertisers," Kabateck said. "The sophisticated advertisers will know better, will know how to do it. These are the little guys that don't have money to lose on a program like this."
Google declined comment, saying it had not yet received the complaint.
The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in San Jose, Calif., by Kabateck, Brown and Kellner, a law firm that has frequently filed consumer-protection lawsuits that seek multimillion dollar judgments or settlements. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages and class-action status.
Kabateck estimated the unwanted advertising involved brings hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue to Google, though he could not immediately say how much Almeida specifically lost.
Kabateck has tussled with Google before and ultimately joined in a $90 million settlement in 2006 over "click fraud," in which merchants are billed for fruitless traffic generated by someone who repeatedly clicks on an advertiser's Web link with no intention of ever buying anything.
- 1 Nomura CEO seeks change with Lehman buy
- 2 CE Donald Tsang meets UK Prime Minister in London
- 3 Macaus hot streak shows signs of cooling
- 4 Financials drag on market; Dow falls more than 240
- 5 Drop in Stock Market Sends Traders to the Safety of the U.S. Dollar
- 6 Economy crisis in Zimbabwe: `If you rest, you starve
- 7 Kerry Properties says the market rumours are untrue
- 1 HK typhoon alert No.1 issued
- 2 HSBC reports 1H fall in profit 29 percent
- 3 Bryant scores 19, helps US beat Russia in tuneup
- 4 Actor Morgan Freeman is injured in car accident
- 5 Jolie-Pitt baby twins photos online
- 6 Christina Applegate treated for breast cancer
- 7 Paris Hilton's mom takes offense at McCain's humor
- 1 Google empowers users to edit search results
- 2 Dell 3Q profit falls as PC spending slows
- 3 Ballmer dismisses Yahoo buyout but open on search
- 4 Corning CEO to withdraw 4Q, 2009 earnings outlook
- 5 Premarket roundup: Yahoo, credit cards
- 6 Law professor fires back at song-swapping lawsuits
- 7 Gadget survey finds many bugs can't be fixed
|
|




















